[OpenAFS] Any budding documentation writers

Simon Wilkinson sxw@inf.ed.ac.uk
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 18:42:50 +0000

On 3 Mar 2010, at 18:31, Chaz Chandler wrote:
> Sounds pretty good for linux-type systems.  On IRIX, pam is broken and
> most of the login stuff in the docs is still current.  I suspect that
> sections of the docs that deal with the less-popular unix variants are
> still largely applicable.

We're committed to doing away with the Kerberos 4 based tools. We  
removed integrated login from the 1.5 branch back in 2006 (with  
3f75e402535843b4e34c09b03fb5181758506d96) - it isn't going to be in  
1.6, and I see no reason not remove it from the current documentation