[OpenAFS] Re: multiplt kernel call traces
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:57:40 -0400
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Andrew Deason <email@example.com> wr=
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:16:48 -0500
> Andrew Deason <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
>> email@example.com wrote:
>> > As a follow up to your response- will this problem "go away" for
>> > kernel version 2.6.33? =A0If so, perhaps I can upgrade to that version=
>> > As an alternative- can I fix this by downgrading the kernel to some
>> > lesser version (say 2.6.30)?
>> "The IMA problem" effectively exists in 2.6.30-2.6.32.
> ...however, Simon tells me that the fedora 2.6.30 packages may not have
> enabled IMA, so he's probably right that 2.6.30 would be fine.
Yeah, pretty sure there was no Fedora 2.6.30 kernel with IMA enabled,
that came with 2.6.31.
The problem with the IMA fix as it was done in 2.6.33 is that it makes
substantial changes to how/where the IMA accounting is done - probably
not something you'd want as-is for 2.6.32-stable.
What I hope is that Fedora 12 will get an update to 2.6.33 in the not
too distant future. If we take 2.6.32 as an example, it was added to
F12 roughly a month after its release, and 2.6.33 was released on Feb.
24. I don't know what the plan is, and looking in Koji I haven't seen
any 2.6.33 builds targeted for F12 yet.