[OpenAFS] Prefered file system for vice partitions
Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:41:37 -0500 (EST)
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by fire.physics.unc.edu id oAMHfc69002326
Lawrence Livermore's native ZFS for Linux is nearing completion. There ar=
still performance issues, but they are apparently hoping for a Jan 2011=20
Note that I just read about this on slashdot=20
which along with the cruft its discussions are wont to have, touches on=20
licensing issues. OpenAFS gets a mention (not by me).
PANIC - Physics and Astronomy Network Infrastructure and Computing
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
"If I'd asked my customers what they wanted, they'd have said a faster ho=
-- Henry Ford
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Mans Nilsson wrote:
> Subject: [OpenAFS] Prefered file system for vice partitions Date: Thu, =
Nov 18, 2010 at 05:57:18PM +0100 Quoting Assarsson, Emil (Emil.Assarsson@=
>> Hi All,
>> I get a little bit confused over what to choose as the base file syste=
m for the vice partitions.
>> If I use ext3 I get very long fsck times so I would like to use someth=
ing else like xfs.
>> Are there any preferred or do I even have a choice? I'm running on ext=
4 right now.
> I like zfs, but that of course limits you to Solaris or FreeBSD. (I
> would not run an userspace file system for OpenAFS vicep*)
> M=C3=A5ns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
> MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668
> YOW!!! I am having fun!!!