[OpenAFS] Overview? Linux filesystem choices

[Dirk Heinrichs]

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigDB21B0D4C1C813E0DF8E77AA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am 28.09.2010 21:49, schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Jeff Blaine <jblaine@kickflop.net> writes:
>=20
>> What's the tried-and-true production-quality Linux equivalent?
>> Anything?  Last I read, nothing.
>=20
> There's nothing really equivalent to ZFS.
>=20
>> Barring an equivalent, what Linux setup...
>=20
>>   a) seems most stable
>>   b) is fsck-less
>=20
>> Even quick grunt responses are appreciated.
>=20
> We use ext3.  It isn't the fastest or the most featureful, but it's the=

> core file system that everyone uses on Linux and for us it's been rock
> solid.  You're the least likely to run into strange problems.
>=20
> Lots of people also use XFS, and it should be reasonably stable.  I wou=
ld
> avoid ReiserFS and JFS due to lack of developers and widespread use.
>=20
> ext4 is getting to the point that it's mature enough to use, but I'm no=
t
> sure I'd trust it yet.

I run btrfs already, which is (or will be) equivalent to ZFS (somehow).

Bye...

	Dirk



--------------enigDB21B0D4C1C813E0DF8E77AA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFMqDlo8NVtnsLkZ7sRAqiwAJ96xabMYRhn31BQO7HzEI8m7rh2gACZAdMj
oPF6eg+U/G8O4AfPVqYKHyk=
=FQmd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigDB21B0D4C1C813E0DF8E77AA--