[OpenAFS] Overview? Linux filesystem choices
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:13:12 -0400
On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:37 PM, Brian Sebby wrote:
> For what it's worth, we've been using ZFS for our AFS partitions for
> years now, and it's been rock solid. It's even saved our butts in a
> situations where ZFS recovered far more gracefully than UFS would
> If you're using Solaris, I believe that there is no reason to use
> other than ZFS at this point.
I have to agree with Brian here - we also use ZFS on thumpers and
am very happy with it - that being said we're also looking for
alternatives due to Oracle takeover. I was thinking RHES 6 would work
fine but with the responses I'm seeing might stay with Solaris.
Center for Research Computing
University of Notre Dame
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 02:53:52PM -0700, Patricia O'Reilly wrote:
>> I'm curious, what types of problems have you encountered with
>> ZFS? We are actually considering using ZFS on some of our
>> Jeff Blaine wrote:
>>> We're considering ditching our Sun boxes with vice
>>> partitions on ZFS :(
>>> What's the tried-and-true production-quality Linux
>>> equivalent? Anything? Last I read, nothing.
>>> Barring an equivalent, what Linux setup...
>>> a) seems most stable
>>> b) is fsck-less
>>> Even quick grunt responses are appreciated. Thanks.
>>> OpenAFS-info mailing list
>> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> Brian Sebby (firstname.lastname@example.org) | Infrastructure and Operation Services
> Phone: +1 630.252.9935 | Computing and Information Systems
> Fax: +1 630.252.4601 | Argonne National Laboratory
> OpenAFS-info mailing list