On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Dave Botsch <botsch@cnf.cornell.edu> wrote: > So, in 1.6, are AFSDB records no longer used? Or will they be used if > the SRV records do not exist? This is what confused me also. I believe the SRV record is consulted first. If that does not exist, then AFSDB. - Ken