[OpenAFS] buildbot and packages
Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:01:05 -0400
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Troy Benjegerdes <email@example.com> wrote:
>> >> FUSE library version: 2.8.6
>> >> nullpath_ok: 0
>> >> unique: 1, opcode: INIT (26), nodeid: 0, insize: 56
>> >> INIT: 7.17
>> >> flags=0x0000047b
>> >> max_readahead=0x00020000
>> >> Starting AFS cache scan...found 0 non-empty cache files (0%).
>> >> afsd: All AFS daemons started.
>> >> Segmentation fault
>> > The fuse code currently in the tree was primarily a science experiment by
>> > one developer and is not something that's really ready for production use.
>> > That's not to say this isn't a regression, and of course it would be nice
>> > to fix, but I'm completely unsurprised that it has issues. So far as I
>> > know, no one is currently actively using the fuse code.
>> I don't think maintaining and improving it would be at all a bad thing
>> as it's certainly
>> valuable to have, tho.
> afsd-fuse is an awfully convenient smoke test...
> Something is different between 'tfs' bitbucket checkout on my laptop and the git
> checkout, and I'm not sure what.
> If 'rebuild with debug' symbols is the answer to find the segfault, then why
> don't we change './regen && ./configure && make check' to turn on debug symbols
> by default (at least in master.. we can turn it back off in a release)
"./regen && ./configure --enable-debug && make check"