[OpenAFS] Re: Naming of "backup" and "up" commands
Mon, 23 Sep 2013 09:28:37 +0200
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 09:19:07 +0200
Christof Hanke <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> [added release-team]
> On Sun, 22 Sep 2013 23:42:55 -0500
> Andrew Deason <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Sep 2013 17:51:40 -0700
> > Russ Allbery <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > What would people think if I submitted a patch to OpenAFS to rename up
> > > to afs-up and backup to afs-backup? Would that break a bunch of
> > > critical software? It would be really nice to fix AFS's camping on
> > > obvious namespace.
> > Would it be appropriate to also have an optional compat package that
> > could symlink the original names?
> yes, I think so.
> Thing is, for SuSE I renamed scout to afs_scout.
> I'm not sure if RedHat/SL did some similar renaming
> (probaly using yet another scheme for it)
Actually I found on SL6:
so we have now afs-* afs_* and *.openafs
> So, on possible solution is to
> fix the renaming on gerrit.
> Then the packagers can create their own compatibility packages for this,
> since they are sure of the future binary-names.
> > Either way, sure, makes sense to me. But the people that actually use
> > those commands really do need to say something, even if it's just "yes,
> > sounds good".
> OpenAFS-info mailing list