[OpenAFS] Question for admins regarding pts membership output

[Dirk Heinrichs]

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--------------AUNAnpF4RbG76vFxp9DdW2eR
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------Pu5iEYwrCKE8Yf5vNyDBvpPp";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@altum.de>
To: openafs-info@openafs.org
Message-ID: <21570f3b-9802-fdff-921c-936132ef2d64@altum.de>
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Question for admins regarding pts membership output
References: <7e5e4e6e-085e-6a1d-212d-939c2bad6e7a@auristor.com>
 <Ys7RvywFsb/zofiG@cnf.cornell.edu>
 <CACue0OdAYDrtav9cw0p7gVfrxV_jO2Uxn2h3qNuQJYWUhVTkXA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACue0OdAYDrtav9cw0p7gVfrxV_jO2Uxn2h3qNuQJYWUhVTkXA@mail.gmail.com>

--------------Pu5iEYwrCKE8Yf5vNyDBvpPp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ed Rude:

> I think I prefer the new behavior you are suggesting as the default.

I'd prefer to have the current behavior as default, as to not break
current scripts. Admins can then decide to enhance their scripts as
needed instead of being forced to change them because they got broken.

Bye...

=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Dirk

--=20
Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@altum.de>
Matrix-Adresse: @heini:chat.altum.de
GPG Public Key: 80F1540E03A3968F3D79C382853C32C427B48049
Privacy Handbuch: https://www.privacy-handbuch.de


--------------Pu5iEYwrCKE8Yf5vNyDBvpPp--

--------------AUNAnpF4RbG76vFxp9DdW2eR
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQQBbRZ091iOtChJXdXJlzdNRFS0TAUCYs/mrAAKCRDJlzdNRFS0
TMQAAQC9G/4iE7fAv5cVoegXIOVtneWtLNmicqWoyWWRToFV+gEA6Ei9snm408ir
d5+NillqqlCN5Lmlfh8dp++uwZRGTQE=
=ZaPA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------AUNAnpF4RbG76vFxp9DdW2eR--