[AFS3-std] Second Draft of Standardisation Document
Jake Thebault-Spieker
summatusmentis@gmail.com
Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:31:20 -0500
------=_Part_25360_14753230.1220041880507
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
> I'm not sure what you mean by "voting members". But yes, if a given
> implementation doesn't care to nominate a registrar, we'll just have to have
> fewer bootstrap registrars. We can't force people to serve.
>
>
Is it worth checking out each of the current implementations, seeing if the
community/developers are willing/able to provide a registrar, and modify the
document accordingly? It seems misleading to provide stipulation as to who
will be part of the bootstrap process, and then potentially have some
implementations not provide a registrar.
On a completely unrelated note, On pg. 6, the first paragraph, that reads
In addition, by submitting this Internet-Draft, to the extent that
this Internet-Draft or any portionthereof is protected by copyright
and other rights of authorship, the Contributor, and each named
co-Contributor, and the organization he or she represents or is
sponsored by (if any) grant a perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive,
royalty-free, world-wide right and license to any and all persons
under all intellectual property rights in this Internet-Draft:
should say "[...]or any portion thereof[...]". Minor spelling stuff, but
important nonetheless :)
--
Jacob Thebault-Spieker
Cell: (320) 288-6412
http://summatusmentis.wordpress.com
------=_Part_25360_14753230.1220041880507
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I'm not sure what you mean by "voting members". But yes, if a given implementation doesn't care to nominate a registrar, we'll just have to have fewer bootstrap registrars. We can't force people to serve.<br>
<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Is it worth checking out each of the current implementations, seeing if the community/developers are willing/able to provide a registrar, and modify the document accordingly? It seems misleading to provide stipulation as to who will be part of the bootstrap process, and then potentially have some implementations not provide a registrar.<br>
<br>On a completely unrelated note, On pg. 6, the first paragraph, that reads<br><div style="margin-left: 40px;">In addition, by submitting this Internet-Draft, to the extent that<br id="pbv9343"> this Internet-Draft or any<span id="zu160" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 0);"> portionthereof is prote</span>cted by copyright<br id="pbv9344">
and other rights of authorship, the Contributor, and each named<br id="pbv9345"> co-Contributor, and the organization he or she represents or is<br id="pbv9346"> sponsored by (if any) grant a perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive,<br id="pbv9347">
royalty-free, world-wide right and license to any and all persons<br id="pbv9348"> under all intellectual property rights in this Internet-Draft:<br></div><br>should say "[...]or any portion thereof[...]". Minor spelling stuff, but important nonetheless :)<br>
</div></div><br>-- <br>Jacob Thebault-Spieker<br>Cell: (320) 288-6412<br><a href="http://summatusmentis.wordpress.com">http://summatusmentis.wordpress.com</a><br>
</div>
------=_Part_25360_14753230.1220041880507--