[AFS3-std] review comments for draft-deason-afs3-getsizev2-03

[Michael Meffie]

On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 13:56:51 -0400
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I've read this document and have delightfully little to say about it. 
> It's a pretty straightforward enhancement filling a long-standing void, 
> which is good.
> 
> The only real comment I might offer is that this is in last call jointly 
> with a document defining 64-bit time types.  Seciton 5.1 does mention 
> future work for improving date representations (now concurrent work), but 
> it doesn't seem that there is compelling reason to reopen this document to 
> use the 64-bit time representation.
> 
> It's unclear whether we want to suggest that the values of the GetSizeV2 
> flags match the values of the DumpV2 flags, since they need not have the 
> same flags.  Given that there's only one flag at present and adding more 
> would require some though, I don't think it matters either way.
> 
> It also struck me in parts of Section 8 that we sometimes request things 
> of the registry and at other times suggest actions for them.  I don't know 
> how important the distinction is; we could probably just request things 
> always.
> 
> Anyway, this document is fine and I would be happy if it was published 
> as-is.  I do not think any changes are necessary.

Thank you Ben, for the review and the comments.

Thanks,
Mike

-- 
Michael Meffie <mmeffie@sinenomine.net>