[OpenAFS-devel] Anyone have i386_linux24/2.4.5-x working w/ c urrent cvs?

Herbert Huber Herbert.Huber@lrz-muenchen.de
Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:41:34 +0200


"Neulinger, Nathan" wrote:

> Fyi - I just tried and don't have this problem on i386_linux22 built against
> current.
>
> I'm going to try cleaning up this system and building again, just in case I
> have a kernel source/headers/something or other mismatch that is causing
> goofiness, but I'd still appreciate a heads up if anyone else is running ok
> with 24 and current cvs.
>
> -- Nathan
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Neulinger, Nathan [mailto:nneul@umr.edu]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 2:03 PM
> > To: 'openafs-devel@openafs.org'
> > Subject: RE: [OpenAFS-devel] Anyone have i386_linux24/2.4.5-x
> > working w/
> > c urrent cvs?
> >
> >
> > I'm getting some very strange symptoms... Last time I had a
> > working build
> > was before June 28th or so (before I left on vacation and all the full
> > autoconf stuff was done).
> >
> > Sometimes afsd starts ok, and looks like it started up ok,
> > but /afs seems to
> > point to / and claims not to be mounted. Other times, I'm
> > getting two oops's
> > after the mount. Both are bad refCount messages with the
> > refCount being a
> > large (but not near any overflow) negative number like
> > -923429898. The first
> > of the two oopses has a "failed to store file (19)", which
> > corresponds to
> > ENODEV.
> >
> > In either case if I do a 'df -i' it hangs.
> >
> > I've recreated the afscache filesystem, everything is from a
> > clean build
> > from current with kgcc on rh71.
> >
> > The trace from the oops isn't particularly useful either but
> > I can get it if
> > needed. All oops's have been in osi_iput, afs_shared_mmap_ops, calling
> > osi_Panic.
> >
> > -- Nathan
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Neulinger, Nathan [mailto:nneul@umr.edu]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 9:09 AM
> > > To: 'openafs-devel@openafs.org'
> > > Subject: [OpenAFS-devel] Anyone have i386_linux24/2.4.5-x working w/
> > > current cvs?
> > >
> > >
> > > I am currently unable to get a working build. The compile
> > > completes just
> > > fine (well, except for kdump not getting the kernel version,
> > > but that's a
> > > minor issue), but I get an oops every time I start afsd. Only
> > > changes from
> > > the base are to force use of kgcc for everything.
> > >
> > > -- Nathan
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Nathan Neulinger                       EMail:  nneul@umr.edu
> > > University of Missouri - Rolla         Phone: (573) 341-4841
> > > Computing Services                       Fax: (573) 341-4216
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > OpenAFS-devel mailing list
> > > OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org
> > > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenAFS-devel mailing list
> > OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org
> > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-devel mailing list
> OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

We are running openafs cvs from 20.6.2001 on single and dual nodes with a high
memory enabled  2.4.5 since 2.7.2001 without any problems . I have to say that
we use SuSE 6.4 on our cluster nodes (libc-2.1.3-155)!

Regards

/Herbert