[OpenAFS-devel] @sys as list patch in CVS

Tue, 5 Jun 2001 14:17:05 -0500

From the looks of that documentation:

....
!-- Begin Header Records  ========================================== -->
<!-- /tmp/idwt3224/auagd000.scr converted by idb2h R4.2 (359) ID      -->
<!-- Workbench Version (AIX) on 10 Nov 1999 at 09:12:15               -->
<meta HTTP-EQUIV="updated" CONTENT="Wed, 10 Nov 1999 09:12:15">
<meta HTTP-EQUIV="review" CONTENT="Fri, 10 Nov 2000 09:12:15">
<meta HTTP-EQUIV="expires" CONTENT="Sat, 10 Nov 2001 09:12:15">
</head><body>
<!-- (C) IBM Corporation 2000. All Rights Reserved    --> <body
bgcolor="ffffff"> <!-- End Header Records
============================================ -->
....

It looks like it was generated using something called "idb2h". What source
files does that take? Maybe they are generating the ps/pdf from that same
tool?

-- Nathan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neulinger, Nathan [mailto:nneul@umr.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 2:14 PM
> To: openafs-devel@openafs.org
> Subject: RE: [OpenAFS-devel] @sys as list patch in CVS
> 
> 
> Well, would the license for what was given to the openafs 
> group cover the
> HTML that is currently out on IBM's site? (or was at one point)
> 
> If so, I'd say - dump the pdf/ps and stick with the HTML docs 
> which are at
> least maintainable.
> 
> -- Nathan
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Derrick J Brashear [mailto:shadow@dementia.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 2:11 PM
> > To: openafs-devel@openafs.org
> > Subject: RE: [OpenAFS-devel] @sys as list patch in CVS
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Neulinger, Nathan wrote:
> > 
> > > Seems like this might be something to request from IBM - 
> > not likely to
> > > happen, but would be worthwhile to at least ask for the 
> > source for the docs.
> > 
> > It's been done before; They claimed not to have source for 
> > the PostScript
> > (which inevitably was just converted to PDF directly)
> > 
> > > I'm sure we could convert the pdf's to something with some 
> > work, but the end
> > > result will be quite ugly unless a ton of by-hand work is done.
> > 
> > By-hand work is going to need to be done regardless.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenAFS-devel mailing list
> > OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org
> > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-devel mailing list
> OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
> 