[OpenAFS-devel] Re: Trial Baloon for Red Hat packaging

Frank Bagehorn/Zurich/IBM fba@zurich.ibm.com
Wed, 26 Sep 2001 17:11:21 +0200


This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 00536EE6C1256AD3_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Derek,
I completely agree with your first point, or the improved version with 
'rh' in it. To my knowledge that makes no problem for the 'rpm' program, I 
already had packages with release numbers looking like this.
However I don't see, why we need to add the kernel version, if the kernel 
package delivers modules for RH stock kernels.
When I look at the RH releases, then 6.2 was delivered with 2.2.14-5.0 and 
is now at 2.2.19-6.2.7, 7.0 was delivered with 2.2.16-22 and is now 
2.2.19-7.0.8 and 7.1 was delivered with 2.4.2-2 and is now 2.4.3-12 . This 
implicitely means RH 6.2/7.0 = 22 and RH 7.1 = 24. There was a 2.4.0-0.26 
in the RH 7.0 preview folders, but I cannot imagine anyone using this.

Regards
Frank

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Frank Bagehorn
IBM Zurich Research Lab.
Saeumerstr. 4
CH-8803 Rueschlikon 
Switzerland
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SMTP: fba@zurich.ibm.com
Notes: Frank Bagehorn/Zurich/IBM@IBMCH
phone: ++41 (01) 724 83 23  fax: ++41 (01) 724 89 59
--=_alternative 00536EE6C1256AD3_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"


<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Derek,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I completely agree with your first point, or the improved version with 'rh' in it. To my knowledge that makes no problem for the 'rpm' program, I already had packages with release numbers looking like this.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">However I don't see, why we need to add the kernel version, if the kernel package delivers modules for RH stock kernels.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">When I look at the RH releases, then 6.2 was delivered with 2.2.14-5.0 and is now at 2.2.19-6.2.7, 7.0 was delivered with 2.2.16-22 and is now 2.2.19-7.0.8 and 7.1 was delivered with 2.4.2-2 and is now 2.4.3-12 . This implicitely means RH 6.2/7.0 = 22 and RH 7.1 = 24. There was a 2.4.0-0.26 in the RH 7.0 preview folders, but I cannot imagine anyone using this.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Regards</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Frank</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
Dr. Frank Bagehorn<br>
IBM Zurich Research Lab.<br>
Saeumerstr. 4<br>
CH-8803 Rueschlikon <br>
Switzerland<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
SMTP: fba@zurich.ibm.com<br>
Notes: Frank Bagehorn/Zurich/IBM@IBMCH<br>
phone: ++41 (01) 724 83 23 &nbsp;fax: ++41 (01) 724 89 59</font>
--=_alternative 00536EE6C1256AD3_=--