[OpenAFS-devel] tools and additional autoconf options...

[Neulinger, Nathan]

perhaps... but what is the consensus? That we would rather not have any
other tools built with openafs - i.e. keep them all independent? Or that we
should make it as easy as possible for new sites to do it one of the ways
that we suggest?

If nothing else, let's at least get it as a module on openafs.org cvs so
that we can have a canonical location for the tools and source.

-- Nathan

------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan Neulinger                       EMail:  nneul@umr.edu
University of Missouri - Rolla         Phone: (573) 341-4841
Computing Services                       Fax: (573) 341-4216


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derrick J Brashear [mailto:shadow@dementia.org] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:31 PM
> To: openafs-devel@openafs.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS-devel] tools and additional autoconf options...
> 
> 
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Neulinger, Nathan wrote:
> 
> > Since we're starting to add other tools - what's the policy/general
> > consensus on adding support for other afs related tools?
> 
> This is just for the test suite and not anything general, so drawing
> conclusions is pretty meaningless.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-devel mailing list
> OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
>