[OpenAFS-devel] process.c

[Nathan Neulinger]

Not sure it buys us much. 

We'd be adding a whole bunch of .s files, but still have to have the
special targets in makefile, since compiled differently.

I guess it would simplify process.s/process.c some.

Is inline assembly universally available? I wonder if we could make them
all process.SYSNAME.c? Then should be able to make a single rule for
compiling all of the pieces.

-- Nathan

On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 10:58, Jim Rees wrote:
> Here is something I'd like to see done.  Split up lwp/process.s into a bunch
> of separate sysname files.  We've already got process.s.hpux and
> process.fbsd.s (which is actually redundant).
> 
> Maybe Nathan would be willing to tackle this.
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-devel mailing list
> OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
-- 

------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan Neulinger                       EMail:  nneul@umr.edu
University of Missouri - Rolla         Phone: (573) 341-4841
Computing Services                       Fax: (573) 341-4216