[OpenAFS-devel] Compiling problems

[Nathan Neulinger]

One of the issues is the inconsitencies in typing/defintitions/etc. In
most cases, we've taken care of the mixed includes, but there have been
numerous cases of symbol conflicts in the past. I'm not necessarily
sayings it's the best course, but since we've made significant efforts
to use our own xdr stuff where possible, seems like it would be
worthwhile to make it completely independent with no possibility of
confusion as to what definitions/routines/etc. are being used.

-- Nathan

On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 15:43, Jim Rees wrote:
> Is there really a need to do this?  I don't think there is any conflict in
> semantics, as there is in snprintf, it's just a matter of not trying to use
> both the system xdr.h and the openafs one at the same time, right?
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-devel mailing list
> OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
-- 

------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan Neulinger                       EMail:  nneul@umr.edu
University of Missouri - Rolla         Phone: (573) 341-4841
UMR Information Technology             Fax: (573) 341-4216