[OpenAFS-devel] Salvager should be less verbose (with patch)
Horst Birthelmer
horst@riback.net
Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:06:24 +0100
On Mar 18, 2005, at 2:55 PM, Harald Barth wrote:
>
> Improvment to salvager which otherwise fills up our partitions with
> log messages. After patch below it should write
>
> 1000 inodes to process
> 900 inodes to proces
> 800 inodes to process
> 700 inodes to process
> 600 inodes to process
> 500 inodes to process
> 400 inodes to process
> 300 inodes to process
> 200 inodes to process
> 100 inodes to process
> 90 inodes to process
> 80 inodes to process
> 70 inodes to process
> 60 inodes to process
> 50 inodes to process
> 40 inodes to process
> 30 inodes to process
> 20 inodes to process
> 10 inodes to process
> 9 inodes to process
> 8 inodes to process
> 7 inodes to process
> 6 inodes to process
> 5 inodes to process
> 4 inodes to process
> 3 inodes to process
> 2 inodes to process
> 1 inodes to process
>
> instead one line for every inode (3411985 times on our server) which
> accounts for around half the size of this file:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 2 root bin 152391076 Mar 10 20:41
> /usr/openafs/var/openafs/logs/SalvageLog
>
> Harald.
>
>
> --- openafs-1.3.79/src/vol/vol-salvage.c.orig 2005-03-18
> 14:28:41.000000000 +0100
> +++ openafs-1.3.79/src/vol/vol-salvage.c 2005-03-18
> 14:44:12.000000000 +0100
> @@ -2029,6 +2029,7 @@
>
> /* Fix actual inode counts */
> if (!Showmode) {
> + int modulo = 100000;
> Log("totalInodes %d\n",totalInodes);
> for (ip = inodes; totalInodes; ip++, totalInodes--) {
> static int TraceBadLinkCounts = 0;
> @@ -2065,8 +2066,19 @@
> }
> ip->linkCount++;
> }
> -
> - Log("%d inodes to process\n",totalInodes);
> +
> + if (totalInodes <= 10)
> + modulo = 1;
> + else if (totalInodes <= 100)
> + modulo = 10;
> + else if (totalInodes <= 1000)
> + modulo = 100;
> + else if (totalInodes <= 10000)
> + modulo = 1000;
> + else if (totalInodes <= 100000)
> + modulo = 10000;
> + if (totalInodes % modulo == 0)
> + Log("%d inodes to process\n",totalInodes);
> }
> #ifdef AFS_NAMEI_ENV
> while (dec_VGLinkH > 0) {
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-devel mailing list
> OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
>
>
There was another patch around, doing almost the same thing.
Is this patch against the current CVS??
If yes, ignore this
...and remember we had this kind of discussion before :-)
Horst