openafs-utils (was: [OpenAFS-devel] status of src/tests)

[Mike Fedyk]

Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> I don't think either of those tools, or various others, really belong in 
> the OpenAFS distribution.  OpenAFS should concentrate on being a 
> filesystem, not on incorporating into its distribution every tool 
> someone might want to use with it.

Then where should the afs-utils package be kept?  Having the tools kept 
in one place under source control with a bug tracker can only be good.

That said, in what circumstances are these tools useful?