[OpenAFS-devel] rxk5 branch is ready; please test
Derrick Brashear
shadow@gmail.com
Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:37:44 -0500
------=_Part_2559_22726715.1200083864967
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On Jan 11, 2008 3:31 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu> wrote:
> --On Friday, January 11, 2008 02:13:49 PM -0600 "Douglas E. Engert"
> <deengert@anl.gov> wrote:
>
> > This afternoon, did a cvs update, and found three new problems.
> > All three are because the Solaris compiler considers a void
> > function returning a value as an error.
>
> Well, I would expect any compiler to produce at least a warning for that.
> IMHO this code is integrated it needs to be cleaned up to the point where
> not only does it build on all of our platforms, but it doesn't
> substantially increase the number of warnings, at least in modules that
> have already been cleaned up in that respect.
>
i suspect this is a 1.5.x version rxk5 1.5.x divergence issue.
------=_Part_2559_22726715.1200083864967
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 11, 2008 3:31 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman <<a href="mailto:jhutz@cmu.edu">jhutz@cmu.edu</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
--On Friday, January 11, 2008 02:13:49 PM -0600 "Douglas E. Engert"<br><<a href="mailto:deengert@anl.gov">deengert@anl.gov</a>> wrote:<br><br>> This afternoon, did a cvs update, and found three new problems.
<br>> All three are because the Solaris compiler considers a void<br>> function returning a value as an error.<br><br>Well, I would expect any compiler to produce at least a warning for that.<br>IMHO this code is integrated it needs to be cleaned up to the point where
<br>not only does it build on all of our platforms, but it doesn't<br>substantially increase the number of warnings, at least in modules that<br>have already been cleaned up in that respect.<br></blockquote><div><br>i suspect this is a
1.5.x version rxk5 1.5.x divergence issue.<br><br> <br></div></div><br>
------=_Part_2559_22726715.1200083864967--