[OpenAFS-devel] Re: OpenAFS Master Repository branch, master,
updated. openafs-devel-1_5_65-15-ge5cf14b
Derrick Brashear
shadow@gmail.com
Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:36:10 -0400
--001485f7d8c00f3f7b0475488143
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Andrew Deason <adeason@sinenomine.net>wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:41:35 -0400
> Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > I don't mean you, particularly. Until we have a framework better
> > > than the one contributed 7 years ago for testing, it's all in flux,
> > > and while I could elaborate suggestions for implementing a new one,
> > > unless someone's actually promising to do it, there are more
> > > pressing and useful things I could do *now* with the time.
> >
> > /me nods. I don't know where a good, solid win is there either, but
> > if someone *does* know where we could make some solid improvements
> > (i.e., stuff we could get done in the short term, not pie-in-the-sky
> > stuff), I'd like to hear it.
>
> Well, you can still write your own tests, completely ignoring the
> existing framework. I have a few volume-operation-related ones I've been
> using recently. Getting them into a robust state takes time I haven't
> spent yet, though; I don't consider them at the level of quality for
> inclusion in the tree at this time.
>
>
Sure, even sans-framework having tests is valuable, but until we have a
framework, taking them now means more work later when we get something to
fit them into.
--001485f7d8c00f3f7b0475488143
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Andrew D=
eason <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:adeason@sinenomine.net">adeas=
on@sinenomine.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote=
" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0=
.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:41:35 -0400<br>
<div class=3D"im">Steven Jenkins <<a href=3D"mailto:steven.jenkins@gmail=
.com">steven.jenkins@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div><div class=3D"im">> > I don't mean you, particularly. Until=
we have a framework better<br>
> > than the one contributed 7 years ago for testing, it's all in=
flux,<br>
> > and while I could elaborate suggestions for implementing a new on=
e,<br>
> > unless someone's actually promising to do it, there are more<=
br>
> > pressing and useful things I could do *now* with the time.<br>
><br>
> /me nods. =A0I don't know where a good, solid win is there either,=
but<br>
> if someone *does* know where we could make some solid improvements<br>
> (i.e., stuff we could get done in the short term, not pie-in-the-sky<b=
r>
> stuff), I'd like to hear it.<br>
<br>
</div>Well, you can still write your own tests, completely ignoring the<br>
existing framework. I have a few volume-operation-related ones I've bee=
n<br>
using recently. Getting them into a robust state takes time I haven't<b=
r>
spent yet, though; I don't consider them at the level of quality for<br=
>
inclusion in the tree at this time.<br><br></blockquote><div><br>Sure, even=
sans-framework having tests is valuable, but until we have a framework, ta=
king them now means more work later when we get something to fit them into.=
<br>
=A0<br></div></div>
--001485f7d8c00f3f7b0475488143--