[OpenAFS-devel] Re: OpenAFS Master Repository branch, master,
updated. BP--openafs-stable-1_6_x-1222-g7d76a5b
Jeffrey Altman
jaltman@your-file-system.com
Sat, 04 Jun 2011 19:17:19 -0400
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig2AB34C5B4D04661C16C70BA7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUTF-8" http-equiv=3D"Content-Ty=
pe">
</head>
<body bgcolor=3D"#ffffff" text=3D"#000000">
On 6/4/2011 6:52 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
<blockquote
cite=3D"mid:alpine.GSO.1.10.1106041839070.6818@multics.mit.edu"
type=3D"cite">I really do not care much and do not want to start a
bikeshed, but I was wondering if there was any reason to put the +
to the right of the permission (as opposed to the left as chmod(1)
does), or if it was just an arbitrary choice.
<br>
<br>
Thanks,
<br>
<br>
Ben Kaduk<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Easy.=C2=A0 A - to the left would be treated as a flag or positional
indicator to the command parser.<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------enig2AB34C5B4D04661C16C70BA7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN6r0BAAoJENxm1CNJffh4FwYIAMNO0Nuf2NcbPJmOy3uJg6Sg
lZkb9ACIyGmssuuxNUz30qUaZT1jgQ6rp8rFSH1xxuxgjgtU+O8WPKgAr4s317S0
+cMukUjcBTS7+LZH2sSN7VWCjfuSS7zvfaIZaTSrHfjLN0UOy5AWgs95QNl4c0gM
TWUPXlGx98er/7jWBqhYJtXqk9HO/fFMUTpG2oSn58Q3sA3nW++WwM8tXsh3wJ4l
XMxgcuZgI69Tyrikzm9s1rs7+RuvIlcCpLmYO4/0h36vV4GJAbjPRDU0AsvqEGBj
Tor9AUBoxWGtjR3x7cNwfZzfVz6Cl5VtPaisQ/Sy7BYBjK6KhniYI1e0ss1XkFk=
=MdTo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig2AB34C5B4D04661C16C70BA7--