[OpenAFS] key issues for OpenAFS future?

[Roberto.Gomezel@ts.infn.it]

Hi all,
       I agree with Tim. I think it would be great to have a web page like that 
on the OpenAFS site.
 Thanks in advance
   Roberto Gomezel
        INFN
> > As far i know you cant turn on logging on your /vice - partitions on
> > solaris if dont want things to break. You say it works now ? Do i have to
> > run namei-filerserver then ?
> >
>   I'd appriciate it if someone could clairify this.  In looking through the
> responces to this message, I saw two opposite responces.  One saying that
> you can use ufs with logging as a /vice partition on solaris, and one that
> said that you couldn't(assuming that you turned on iname).
> 
> > I am sure you cant run your /vice-partitions on AdvFS on Tru64, which
> sucks
> > pretty much.
> >
> > I dont think we support /vice in XFS on IRIX either, or i am wrong ?
> >
>   Boy I hope so. :^}  Transarc was supporting xfs on irix(as much as anyone
> ever supports irix ;), and we've been using it since around 3.4a or 3.5 into
> openafs 1.2.6 currently.  This is without the iname stuff.  We're also
> running linux with xfs on the /vice partitions without namei.
> 
>   In responce to this email, it sounds like a web page on openafs.org would
> be highly recomended which could go through the OSes, and the filesystems,
> and different configurations, stating "supported for /vice with or without
> iname", "supported for /vice without iname"(assumed to be with as well
> right?), "supported for cache", and also "unsupported" and "untested".  You
> could break the tables up into the OSes, then have the FSes on the left, and
> the levels of support on the top. Perhaps even have in the boxes an "as of
> version  x.x.x" if appropriate.
>   Then this page could be updated as things change.  It just seems like
> we're using this mailing list as an "official source" and everything, but
> since there's nothing on the web page, 5 million people keep coming on the
> list and asking, then we get mad when they do. :^}  (not just this thread,
> but also the redhat kernel bug ;)
> 
> Just some thoughts ;)
>   Tim
> 
> > /Jimmy
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenAFS-info mailing list
> > OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
>