[OpenAFS] More Info - RedHat 7.3 with new 2.4.18-17 kernel
Troy Dawson
dawson@fnal.gov
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 15:16:44 -0500
Dan Pritts wrote:
>>On a side note. I'm pretty sure some official people from OpenAFS have
>>complained to RedHat, but is there anything that some of us users can do to
>>let them know that they should stop doing things like this, just because
>>OpenAFS isn't GPL'ed? I'm sure it's breaking more things than AFS, but for
>>me this is the only thing that I'm seeing.
>
>
> FWIW I believe it is not Red Hat's doing, but Linus/the kernel team.
>
I believe you are right. I was thinking this was redhat because in my search
I was seraching for RedHat and sys_call_table. So I was thinking this was
redhat even though it said quite plainly this was in Linux-streams.
This is a little blurb from Petr Vandrovec to Brian Bidulock on the 9th of
October.
> And I believe that export symbols should NOT be _GPL_ONLY: before
> (non-GPL) export of syscall_table was available, non-GPL modules were
> able to hook syscalls, and when _GPL_ONLY was introduced into kernel
> it was promised that we'll never make currently provided functionality
> GPL-only (as far as I remember).
Obviously Petr is on our side. But I wasn't able to find why they were
starting to take these things out in the first place other than some ways to
execute malisious code, but those letters were about 2 years old.
Anyway, it does get a little frustrating.
Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson dawson@fnal.gov (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/OSS CSI Group
__________________________________________________