[OpenAFS] (no subject)

[Derrick J Brashear]

On Thu, 22 May 2003, Lee Damon wrote:

> We have to deploy the new RH 2.whatever.20-mumble.othernumbers kernel for
> security reasons. We're still running OpenAFS 1.2.7 and we'd like to get away
> from that security hole.  Therefor, we are planning an upgrade now.
>
> The question is, 1.2.8 (no known security hole, no problems halting systems)
> or 1.2.9 (no known security hole, possible reboot issues, no additional
> features that we need.)  Which one would you pick based on that data set?

If I were concerned about that, I think I'd look at the current
openafs-stable-1_2_x CVS branch, at least if Rudy Maceyko is correct.