[OpenAFS] OpenAFS & Linux kernel 2.6: please have a trackable bug report / task ?
Jack Neely
slack@quackmaster.net
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:39:35 -0500
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 12:10:36PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Frank Burkhardt <fbo2@gmx.net> writes:
>
> > Is it complicated to rewrite those 2 hooks just for AFS
> > (a little kernel-patch) or is there an OpenAFS-policy demanding
> > not to change the kernel-sources at all?
>
> We don't want to force people to rebuild their kernel in order to
> use AFS. That has ALWAYS been a design goal, even when I did the
> first Linux-AFS port of AFS 3.3 back, oh, ten years ago. The problem
> here is that the kernel gatekeepers wont accept an "only-for-AFS"
> patch.
>
> > Frank
>
> -derek
>
> --
> Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
> Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
> URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
> warlord@MIT.EDU PGP key available
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
>
I'd like to note that, IIRC, if you rebuild the kernel in RHEL (say for
said OpenAFS patch) you are left with a no longer certified version of
RHEL. Again, IIRC, I believe that's about the one big thing that if you
mess with they wont support you.
Important to me as that's the direction I'm trying to take the
university I work for.
Jack Neely
--
Jack Neely <slack@quackmaster.net>
Realm Linux Administration and Development
PAMS Computer Operations at NC State University
GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4 EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89