[OpenAFS] OpenAFS & Linux kernel 2.6: please have a trackable bug report / task ?

Jack Neely slack@quackmaster.net
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:39:35 -0500


On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 12:10:36PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Frank Burkhardt <fbo2@gmx.net> writes:
> 
> > Is it complicated to rewrite those 2 hooks just for AFS
> > (a little kernel-patch) or is there an OpenAFS-policy demanding
> > not to change the kernel-sources at all?
> 
> We don't want to force people to rebuild their kernel in order to
> use AFS.  That has ALWAYS been a design goal, even when I did the
> first Linux-AFS port of AFS 3.3 back, oh, ten years ago.  The problem
> here is that the kernel gatekeepers wont accept an "only-for-AFS"
> patch.
> 
> > Frank
> 
> -derek
> 
> -- 
>        Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
>        Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
>        URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
>        warlord@MIT.EDU                        PGP key available
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
> 

I'd like to note that, IIRC, if you rebuild the kernel in RHEL (say for
said OpenAFS patch) you are left with a no longer certified version of
RHEL.  Again, IIRC, I believe that's about the one big thing that if you
mess with they wont support you.

Important to me as that's the direction I'm trying to take the
university I work for.

Jack Neely

-- 
Jack Neely <slack@quackmaster.net>
Realm Linux Administration and Development
PAMS Computer Operations at NC State University
GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4  EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89