[OpenAFS] AFS documentation update

[Tommie Gannert]

On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, ted creedon wrote:

> So how do you intend to do the automatic table of contents, indexing,
> justification and extraction by operating system type?
>

With XSL? ;) Actually, wouldn't it be possible to use embedded PHP to
generate contents...

> Latex produces html..

To convert to PDF, I always go through LaTeX (I don't trust XSL-FO,
yet).

I have no experience with the HTML rendering in TeX. However, I
suspect it will be sligthly better than Word's HTML export... And
Word produces very big files. Doing straight XML -> HTML can minimize
the file sizes.

>
> tedc
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tommie Gannert [mailto:d00-tga@d.kth.se]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 12:50 AM
> To: ted creedon
> Cc: 'Jeffrey Altman'
> Subject: RE: [OpenAFS] AFS documentation update
>
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, ted creedon wrote:
>
> > Tommie what do you have?
> >
>
> Work to do? ;)
>
> The documentation I wrote for 1.3.70 is in the Wiki
> (NewWindowsDocumentation). My next step is to decide on an XML schema to
> use. Then convert the documentation via XML/XSLT to HtmlHelp. The reason is
> I want to use the CVS in the end. It is also much easier to convert to other
> formats if it's in XML from the start. (Online HTML and PDF are my initial
> thoughts)
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: openafs-info-admin@openafs.org
> > [mailto:openafs-info-admin@openafs.org]
> > On Behalf Of Jeffrey Altman
> > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 7:41 AM
> > To: Lee Damon
> > Cc: ted creedon; openafs-info@openafs.org; Tommie Gannert
> > Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] AFS documentation update
> >
> > Lee Damon wrote:
> >
> > > If, on the other hand, you are only documenting the windows port of
> > > AFS, then word might make sense.
> >
> > If you are working on documenting the Windows port, please do so in
> > conjuction with Tommie Gannert.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Jeffrey Altman
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>