Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:50:34 +0000
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:19:35 +0100
Horst Birthelmer <email@example.com> wrote:
> Replication has nothing to do with AFS backups and volume database
> backup is an entirely separate topic.
> I'm not sure where exactly the confusion is... ;-)
> Those are three completely different things.
> If you can elaborate a little more what you meant by backup server
> what that has to do with replication, maybe we can straighten
I have to bow to you AFS admins, as I'm not quite there yet. I have the
dead tree book, managing afs (the book that 1998 wants back!) and I'm
about half way through, so still have lots to learn.
Anyway, this constantly refers to backup servers, which is probably
where my confusion stems.
As you have outlined the replication is not at the volume level, so I
guess the only way to do this is to change the sate of a readonly to rw.
Regards, Ed http://www.usenix.org.uk - http://irc.is-cool.net
:%s/Open Source/Free Software/g