[OpenAFS] Evaluating AFS for in house use, RFCs...
Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:03:11 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:08:31AM +0100, Horst Birthelmer wrote:
> ... and, Samba and AFS are as secure or unsecure as the admins make =20
> it. The question is how much work you would have to do, to make it =20
> secure, but that's completely beyond the point.
The only real thing you can't get with SMB native is transport encryption.
Transport signing is there, you _can_ nail down auth to just krb (losing
functionality, but what can you do, you have windows clients). Everything e=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----