[OpenAFS] Evaluating AFS for in house use, RFCs...

[Volker Lendecke]

--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:08:31AM +0100, Horst Birthelmer wrote:
> ... and, Samba and AFS are as secure or unsecure as the admins make =20
> it. The question is how much work you would have to do, to make it =20
> secure, but that's completely beyond the point.

The only real thing you can't get with SMB native is transport encryption.
Transport signing is there, you _can_ nail down auth to just krb (losing
functionality, but what can you do, you have windows clients). Everything e=
lse
is comparable.=20

Volker

--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD4ypfUROFNttXCWYRAj/mAJ42ICqHOyakQhylj6cylx/spvzTfACcDlfH
olsQiNPNAcYRR758R+mlf0g=
=XKDa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga--