[OpenAFS] Re: what is "status: 11862790" (Tiger, rc8)
Russ Allbery
rra@stanford.edu
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:48:52 -0800
Adam Megacz <megacz@cs.berkeley.edu> writes:
> Well, there's only one level of indirection (AFSDB->CNAME->A). Also,
> the AFSDB->CNAME question was raised here and it seems like it's
> permissible:
> https://www.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2005-December/020609.html
> Also, I should add, this problem only occurs sporadically -- most of
> the time it works. It's just every once in a while I get this weird
> error. But when it happens it's rather stubborn (sometimes even
> reboots don't change things).
Maybe I'm missing something, but this looks really strange:
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;research.cs.berkeley.edu. IN ANY
;; ANSWER SECTION:
research.cs.berkeley.edu. 86371 IN AFSDB 1 afs.research.CS.Berkeley.EDU.
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
CS.Berkeley.EDU. 7327 IN NS ns.CS.Berkeley.EDU.
CS.Berkeley.EDU. 7327 IN NS ns.EECS.Berkeley.EDU.
CS.Berkeley.EDU. 7327 IN NS cgl.UCSF.EDU.
CS.Berkeley.EDU. 7327 IN NS adns1.Berkeley.EDU.
CS.Berkeley.EDU. 7327 IN NS adns2.Berkeley.EDU.
CS.Berkeley.EDU. 7327 IN NS vangogh.CS.Berkeley.EDU.
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;afs.research.cs.berkeley.edu. IN ANY
;; ANSWER SECTION:
afs.research.cs.berkeley.edu. 86382 IN CNAME research.cs.berkeley.edu.
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
cs.berkeley.edu. 7319 IN NS vangogh.cs.berkeley.edu.
cs.berkeley.edu. 7319 IN NS ns.cs.berkeley.edu.
cs.berkeley.edu. 7319 IN NS ns.EECS.berkeley.edu.
cs.berkeley.edu. 7319 IN NS cgl.UCSF.edu.
cs.berkeley.edu. 7319 IN NS adns1.berkeley.edu.
cs.berkeley.edu. 7319 IN NS adns2.berkeley.edu.
That seems to say that you have an AFSDB record for
research.cs.berkeley.edu pointing to afs.research.cs.berkeley.edu, which
is a CNAME for research.cs.berkeley.edu, which has no records other than
the AFSDB record. This is against our local caching BIND server.
However, when I do that query directly against the listed NS servers, I
get the right results (an additional A and MX record for
research.cs.berkeley.edu).
It's smelling like you have a lame DNS server somewhere, or a lack of
glue, or some other DNS problem that's causing intermittant failures.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>