[OpenAFS] /etc/rc.d/init/afs start does not start afs
Derrick Brashear
shadow@gmail.com
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:49:50 -0500
------=_Part_25480_5140515.1201805390952
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On Jan 31, 2008 1:42 PM, <Stephan.Wiesand@desy.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Derrick Brashear wrote:
>
> > On Jan 31, 2008 11:49 AM, gaurav gunjan jha <crazytitan05@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >> We are having problems while installing the first afs server machine on
> >> scientific linux 4.4 .we have used afs server and client rpms for
> >> installation.
>
> 4.4 is ancient. If it still has to be SL4, why not at least 4.5? And if it
> doesn't, I'd really recommend 5.1 for a new AFS server. It comes with
> packages for the latest OpenAFS release. SL4.x will get those a bit later.
>
ok, so:
>
> > which rpms? i suggest the 1.4.6 rpms on the openafs.org web site, if you
> get
> > rhel4 rpms we should even have a module for your kernel.
>
> He's probably using the SL RPMs. Gaurav, if that's true, this discussion
> should be taken over to the scientific-linux-users list since the init
> script has been quite different from the one in the openafs.org packages
> for a while. We'll send you back here once we've sorted out the issues
> specific to SL ;-) And just to be sure: This is not a recommendation not
> to grab and use the EL4 packages from openafs.org instead of the ones
> coming with SL. But whichever you use, it would be best to address the
> corresponding mailing list first with these questions.
fhs instead of transarc, i guess, is the difference?
------=_Part_25480_5140515.1201805390952
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 31, 2008 1:42 PM, <<a href="mailto:Stephan.Wiesand@desy.de">Stephan.Wiesand@desy.de</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Derrick Brashear wrote:<br><br>> On Jan 31, 2008 11:49 AM, gaurav gunjan jha <<a href="mailto:crazytitan05@gmail.com">crazytitan05@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>><br>>><br>
>> Hi all,<br>>> We are having problems while installing the first afs server machine on<br>>> scientific linux 4.4 .we have used afs server and client rpms for<br>>> installation.<br><br></div>4.4 is ancient. If it still has to be SL4, why not at least 4.5? And if it<br>
doesn't, I'd really recommend 5.1 for a new AFS server. It comes with<br>packages for the latest OpenAFS release. SL4.x will get those a bit later.<br><div class="Ih2E3d"></div></blockquote><div><br>ok, so:<br> <br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d"><br>> which rpms? i suggest the 1.4.6 rpms on the <a href="http://openafs.org" target="_blank">openafs.org</a> web site, if you get<br>
> rhel4 rpms we should even have a module for your kernel.<br><br></div>He's probably using the SL RPMs. Gaurav, if that's true, this discussion<br>should be taken over to the scientific-linux-users list since the init<br>
script has been quite different from the one in the <a href="http://openafs.org" target="_blank">openafs.org</a> packages<br>for a while. We'll send you back here once we've sorted out the issues<br>specific to SL ;-) And just to be sure: This is not a recommendation not<br>
to grab and use the EL4 packages from <a href="http://openafs.org" target="_blank">openafs.org</a> instead of the ones<br>coming with SL. But whichever you use, it would be best to address the<br>corresponding mailing list first with these questions.</blockquote>
<div><br> fhs instead of transarc, i guess, is the difference?<br></div></div><br>
------=_Part_25480_5140515.1201805390952--