[OpenAFS] Re: 1.6 and post-1.6 OpenAFS branch management and
schedule
Andrew Deason
adeason@sinenomine.net
Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:56:03 -0500
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:20:46 -0500
Andrew Deason <adeason@sinenomine.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:06:32 +0200
> Stephan Wiesand <stephan.wiesand@desy.de> wrote:
>
> > sorry, I disagree. If you (the developers and the gatekeepers) are
> > sure that DAFS is the way forward, and reasonably close to being
> > ready, 1.6 and on should not support anything else. Why defer this to
> > 1.10?
>
[...]
Also, when I last brought up eliminating non-DAFS, I was told DAFS does
not compile on windows. But that can be changed :)
--
Andrew Deason
adeason@sinenomine.net