[OpenAFS] Re: Linux ext4 vicep and cache support?
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:56:01 -0500
Would it make sense when using ext4 as a client cache to turn the
journal off, for a little bit more performance?
I'm also wondering if some of the afs cache tunables could also be
translated into mkfs.ext4 tunables, for a closer fit. (afs cache
chunksize vs ext4 extents, etc)
On 01/25/2012 02:21 PM, John W. Sopko Jr. wrote:
> Thanks, all. It has been at least a year since we tried
> running the cache on ext4 with 1.4.12 client and I have
> never tried on a fileserver /vicep partition.
> Our current AFS file servers are redhat 5.7 ext3. When we
> get new servers they will be redhat 6.x and ext4.
> When we upgrade clients to 1.6 I will try ext4 cache.
> Andrew Deason wrote, On 1/25/2012 11:05 AM:
>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:38:30 -0500
>> "John W. Sopko Jr."<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> Is it safe to use ext4 for /vicep partitions?
>>> The install docs do not mention file system type
>> Filesystem doesn't matter for /vicep, for the most part. You can use any
>> fs as long as we get 'normal' unix-y features with it (owner, group,
>> access modes, etc; I assume just saying "POSIX" is enough). The server
>> processes generally don't do anything special with the files in there,
>> except for setting the owner, group, and mode bits to "strange" things.
>>> In the past we had issues with ext4 as a client cache partitions and
>>> continue to use ext3, has anything changed?
>> 1.6 clients use a different mechanism for accessing the cache, and
>> should no longer be limited to particular file systems. All versions of
>> 1.4 I believe still have the same cache fs restrictions, which limits
>> you to ext2/3.
>> That is, assuming Linux 2.6+. Nearly all Linux-specific changes to 1.6
>> clients don't apply to Linux 2.4 and earlier.
Phone: (802) 769-6850
This e-mail and its attachments, if any, may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message from your system without copying it and notify sender of the misdirection by reply e-mail.