[OpenAFS] Cache partition choice still limited to ext2 on Linux?
Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:07:51 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Am Mittwoch 07 November 2012, 09:02:44 schrieb Marc Dionne:
> In my (limited) experience with memcache, it doesn't behave very well
> if the system is memory contrained and is under pressure.
Hmm, I wouldn't call a system with 4G memory and not much more running than
KDE with a handful of apps (mail, web browser) memory constrained ;)
> > Thanks a lot. The idea was to setup a btrfs-only VM for testing purposes,
> > and use a subvolume for the cache. Not sure about the loop-mount method
> > in this case, since you also can't put swapfiles on btrfs.
> I have some machines that have used btrfs as a cache for a long time.
> It initially exposed a few bugs in the caching code but I'm not aware
> of any issues in the 1.6 releases.
OK, great. So it shouldn't be a problem to use a btrfs subvolume and (maybe)
set some quota.
Dirk Heinrichs <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Tel: +49 (0)2471 209385 | Mobil: +49 (0)176 34473913
GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Jabber: email@example.com
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----