[OpenAFS] Re: RHEL 7.5 beta / 3.10.0-830.el7.x86_66 kernel lock
Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:55:09 +0100
> On 2. Feb 2018, at 02:14, Benjamin Kaduk <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 05:11:24PM +0100, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
>> Comparing the 184.108.40.206 module builds from the SL packaging, where the =
kABI hashes of the used symbols are stored as a requirement, is seems =
none of those hashes changed between -693 and -830.
>> There are two differences in the configure results:
> That's very helpful to know.
> Does the new tree actually have a sched/signal.h header?
Yes it does. The only content is a guarded include of <linux/sched.h>
> Does the new struct file_operations have an 'iterate' member
Yes it does, wrapped in a RH_KABI_ITERATE macro.
> (The idea being to tell whether they changed something in new and
> interesting ways or our configure test(s) are broken.)
It's the former :-(
15738 Zeuthen, Germany