[OpenAFS] Re: RHEL 7.5 beta / 3.10.0-830.el7.x86_66 kernel lock
Fri, 2 Feb 2018 10:05:50 +0100
> On 2. Feb 2018, at 09:55, Stephan Wiesand <email@example.com> =
>> On 2. Feb 2018, at 02:14, Benjamin Kaduk <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 05:11:24PM +0100, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
>>> Comparing the 184.108.40.206 module builds from the SL packaging, where =
the kABI hashes of the used symbols are stored as a requirement, is =
seems none of those hashes changed between -693 and -830.
>>> There are two differences in the configure results:
>> That's very helpful to know.
>> Does the new tree actually have a sched/signal.h header?
> Yes it does. The only content is a guarded include of <linux/sched.h>
>> Does the new struct file_operations have an 'iterate' member
> Yes it does, wrapped in a RH_KABI_ITERATE macro.
er, nonsense, that's RH_KABI_EXTEND, sorry
>> (The idea being to tell whether they changed something in new and
>> interesting ways or our configure test(s) are broken.)
> It's the former :-(