[OpenAFS-devel] Call for consensus: configure defaulting behavior change

Derek Atkins warlord@MIT.EDU
29 Aug 2001 10:33:47 -0400


I use lndir, and it seems to work for me.  But I agree that losing obj
was a real loss.

-derek

Derrick J Brashear <shadow@dementia.org> writes:

> On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Jim Rees wrote:
> 
> >   Who are these people and what are they doing? Anyone? (Not that keeping
> >   the complete tree is hard)
> > 
> > Personally, I fear and loathe the dest tree and would not miss it for a
> > minute.
> > 
> > On the other hand, I really miss the obj tree.  Losing it is a disaster for
> > me.  I am so used to building afs simultaneously for multiple platforms that
> > I can't even think how to proceed.  As I see it, I can either maintain
> > multiple source trees, or give up trying to build afs a piece at a time and
> > only build all or nothing.  Neither prospect is very appealing.
> 
> lndir/mklinks? VPATH support would be nice but will be more work, but is
> in my opinion the obvious in-band way to solve this. In the meantime I'm
> using mklinks more or less as I have for years.
> 
> -D
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-devel mailing list
> OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord@MIT.EDU                        PGP key available