[OpenAFS-devel] Call for consensus: configure defaulting behavior change
Derek Atkins
warlord@MIT.EDU
29 Aug 2001 10:33:47 -0400
I use lndir, and it seems to work for me. But I agree that losing obj
was a real loss.
-derek
Derrick J Brashear <shadow@dementia.org> writes:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Jim Rees wrote:
>
> > Who are these people and what are they doing? Anyone? (Not that keeping
> > the complete tree is hard)
> >
> > Personally, I fear and loathe the dest tree and would not miss it for a
> > minute.
> >
> > On the other hand, I really miss the obj tree. Losing it is a disaster for
> > me. I am so used to building afs simultaneously for multiple platforms that
> > I can't even think how to proceed. As I see it, I can either maintain
> > multiple source trees, or give up trying to build afs a piece at a time and
> > only build all or nothing. Neither prospect is very appealing.
>
> lndir/mklinks? VPATH support would be nice but will be more work, but is
> in my opinion the obvious in-band way to solve this. In the meantime I'm
> using mklinks more or less as I have for years.
>
> -D
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-devel mailing list
> OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
warlord@MIT.EDU PGP key available